
The column interaction diagram is a boundary area graph showing the various combinations of axial loads and moments that the column can safely hold. The benefit of a column interaction diagram provides an overview of the strength of the column in question. This study aims to analyze rectangular and circular columns using column interaction diagrams and then compare the strength of the columns in withstanding a combination of axial loads and bending moments with the same area. In this study, square and circular columns have the same number of reinforcement, diameter of reinforcement, steel strength, concrete quality, and cross-sectional area. The column is reviewed based on five conditions, namely pure axial load conditions, pure bending moment, and three failure conditions. Based on the five conditions that occurred, a column interaction diagram was created by using Microsoft Excel. Results of the analysis show that in the same area, the square column is stronger in withstanding the bending moment (Mu) of the circular column by 0.015 - 0.61%, while the circular column is stronger in resisting the axial force (Pu) of the square column by 1,9 - 4.4%.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
