Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Investigation of Abrasion of Nitrile Rubber

Authors: S. W. Zhang;

Investigation of Abrasion of Nitrile Rubber

Abstract

Abstract Abrasion of NBR appears as a dry (particulate) wear, similar to unfilled BR, NR, and SBR, and filled BR. The abraded surface seems textured on two scales: that of the ridges of the abrasion pattern and that of small particles of debris. The formation of macroridges on filled and unfilled NBR appears to involve two distinct ridges one formed after the other. First, fine and tightly spaced primary ridges, followed by rough and sparsely spaced secondary ridges. The abrasion pattern on unfilled NBR is relatively stable once steady state has been reached and the pattern has been fully developed. As for the filled NBR, both the scale and roughness of the secondary ridges are uneven, even if steady state has been reached completely. Wear rates of filled and unfilled NBR have been found to be proportional to an exponent n of the applied frictional work. The unsteady state rates of wear were also somewhat dependent on the number of revolutions of the test wheel. Both the proportionality coefficient k and exponent n are dependent upon the composition and also upon the wear state. The exponent n for unfilled NBR is greater than that for filled NBR, and for the unsteady state it is greater than that for steady state. Reversals in the relative rates of wear between filled and unfilled NBR are also observed at different severities of abrasion. This phenomenon perhaps reflects a competition between two different physical processes: crack growth and rupture of tongue tip. The dominant process may be crack growth at low severities of wear and rupture of the tongue tip at high severities of wear. Therefore, the fact that, at high severities, carbon black markedly reduces the rates of abrasion might be attributed to the tensile strength gain of rubber compounds due to reinforcement by carbon black.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!