Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://www.bmva.org/...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5244/c.24.4...
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object . 2025
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Parameter Tuning from Pairwise Preferences

Authors: Pavel Kisilev; Daniel Freedman;

Parameter Tuning from Pairwise Preferences

Abstract

That most computer vision algorithms rely on parameters is a fact of life which cannot be avoided. For optimal algorithm performance, these parameters need to be tuned; generally speaking, this tuning is done manually or in some heuristic fashion. In this paper, we propose a new, general method for attacking the problem of parameter tuning, which is applicable to a wide variety of computer vision algorithms. Our method is semi-automatic: a user is given several pairs of outputs from a given vision algorithm, which have been generated by different parameter values; the user is then required to simply choose, for each pair, which output is preferred. Our method then finds the smoothest preference function which satisfies these user preferences. Using the theory of Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, we show how this problem can be reduced to a finite-dimensional convex optimization. We validate our parameter tuning scheme both on simulated data and on the problem of tuning the parameters of an image denoising algorithm.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
bronze