
Papayannis enfoca sus objeciones en dos puntos primordiales de la Escuela de Toronto —a la que pertenece Martín Hevia y sostiene en su libro Reasonableness and Responsibility—. El primero es el énfasis en la bilateralidad de las relaciones de derecho privado; y el segundo es que las normas referidas a la celebración y el cumplimiento de los contratos o a la compensación de los daños que nos causamos unos a otros expresan un modo de ordenación adecuada para los asuntos privados. En conclusión, Papayannis sostiene que Hevia no logra mostrar que su teoría se distinga de modo relevante de las concepciones libertarias en lo que hace al derecho contractual.
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, obligaciones, Sociology (General), K1-7720, JC11-607, contratos, bilateralidad, Political theory, HM401-1281
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, obligaciones, Sociology (General), K1-7720, JC11-607, contratos, bilateralidad, Political theory, HM401-1281
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
