
doi: 10.52152/d11173
The aim of the present study is to compare the use and results of a rapid stabilometric platform test with traditional clinical scales to assess the individual clinical evolution of heterogeneous patients with balance disorders during rehabilitation treatment. The 67 participating vertigo patients underwent two assessment sessions, one before starting rehabilitation treatment and one after starting treatment. In each session, six static balance assessment tests with the stabilometric platform were accomplished. Then, the centre of pressure (COP) measured by the device, was processed using the MCQ-Balance method, that transforms the signal into clinical interpretable results. Additionally, in order to compare the results, three medical diagnostic tests were conducted and a methodical flag system to classify their results was proposed. The agreement rises until 85.71% with a contingency coefficient of 0.751 and a Kappa of 0.775. The platform showed a sensitivity of 100% with a specificity of 72.99%. Furthermore, it was not found false negatives in the platform. The stabilometric platform provided valuable assistance in the diagnosis of the evolution of balance pathology, involving less time and uncertainty than traditional tests.
610
610
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
