
doi: 10.5209/rpub.63895
This paper seeks to link the lacanian concept of extimacy with the political identity of partisan as political adversary problematizing his potential exteriority in the psyhcosocial plane. On the one hand, in this problem, from our lacanian position, arises an opposition with the mainstream psychological concepts about the partisan and his actions and effects in the ground of state political exchanges interpreted by social psychology. Later, we will point out the linkage between the partisan concept and the mytical reference of this one. The partisan myth tries to disolve the subversive contingency, in a more subtle way, from the same mythical structure is intended to control the incidence of this one in the political system.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
