Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista de Antropología Social
Article . 2010
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Derechos lingüísticos como derechos humanos

Authors: MAY, Stephen;

Derechos lingüísticos como derechos humanos

Abstract

En los últimos sesenta años, hemos sido testigos del creciente desarrollo y de la articulación de los derechos humanos, en especial en el seno del derecho internacional y a través de las organizaciones internacionales. Sin embargo, en ese periodo, el derecho a mantener una o varias lenguas propias sin discriminación permanece particularmente relegado y/o cuestionado como un derecho humano clave. Esto se debe principalmente a que el reconocimiento de los derechos lingüísticos presupone el reconocimiento de la importancia de un grupo amplio de miembros y contextos sociales —concepciones éstas que chocan ostensiblemente con la primacía de los derechos individuales en la era posterior a la Segunda Guerra Mundial—. Este artículo explora los argumentos a favor y en contra de los derechos lingüísticos, en particular de grupos minoritarios en Europa, y sostiene que los derechos lingüísticos pueden y deben ser reconocidos como un importante derecho humano. De este modo, el artículo se basa en los debates ideológicos de teoría política y derecho internacional, así como en el importante ejemplo empírico de Cataluña.

In the last 60 years, we have seen the growing development and articulation of human rights, particularly within international law and within and across supranational organizations. However, in that period, the right to maintain one’s language(s), without discrimination, remains peculiarly under–represented and/or problematized as a key human right. This is primarily because the recognition of language rights presupposes a recognition of the importance of wider group memberships and social contexts — conceptions that ostensibly militate against the primacy of individual rights in the post–Second World War era. This paper will explore the arguments for and against language rights, particularly for minority groups within Europe, arguing that language rights can and should be recognized as an important human right. In so doing, the paper will draw on theoretical debates in political theory and international law, as well as the substantive empirical example of Catalonia.

Country
Spain
Keywords

GN301-674, Language rights, Derechos de promoción, Promotion–oriented rights, Cataluña, Derechos humanos, Catalunya, Teorías políticas, Tolerance–oriented rights, Derechos lingüísticos, Tolerancia, Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold
Related to Research communities