
doi: 10.5209/reaa.63701
In the offerings of the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan in the Basin of Mexico, the Aztecs buried thousands of turquoise pieces. The majority of them were inlays assembled in complex mosaics, like disks, ornaments of certain Nahua gods, and parts of chert knives and scepters. With the compositional analysis, I confirmed that almost all of the bluish-stones were chemical or real turquoise from Northwestern Mexico and the American Southwest. But, which was the symbolism of these objects, where they were produced and with which tools and techniques? The aim of this paper is to show the iconographical comparison of the objects with different codex and sculptures, while the technological analysis with experimental archaeology served for the characterization of the manufacturing traces with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). As results, I identified three lapidary styles at Tenochtitlan: one is related with the Mixtecs, another could be non-Mesoamerican, and the last one shares the tools and techniques of the Tenochcan Imperial Style. In addition, I reviewed the Mixteca-Puebla turquoise mosaics and found that the Tenochcan ones were different in the iconography and assemblage of the characters.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
