
doi: 10.5204/lthj.3757
handle: 1814/92784
Artificial general intelligence (AGI) represents an unprecedented ambition within the field of technology, aiming to create systems capable of matching or surpassing human abilities across multiple domains. Unlike Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI), AGI is anticipated to operate without task-specific limitations and predefined purposes, raising complex, pressing issues surrounding autonomy, control and potential societal impact. This article applies Rittel and Webber’s wicked problem theory to critically examine AGI governance, categorising AGI within the ten characteristics of wicked problems. The absence of a definitive formulation, its unstoppable potential evolution, the subjective and context-dependent nature of its solutions, the irreversibility of interventions and the multiplicity of stakeholder perspectives all underscore the inadequacy of existing governance paradigms. In response, this article advocates for dynamic, iterative and flexible governance frameworks that acknowledge AGI’s ontic uniqueness and potential for autonomous evolution. Rather than treating AGI as a distant or hypothetical concern, this analysis argues for a multidimensional, forward-looking governance model that recognises AGI as an urgent and inherently wicked problem.
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, artificial narrow intelligence, Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI), artificial general intelligence, wicked problem theory, Wicked problem theory, K1-7720, Technology governance, technology governance
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, artificial narrow intelligence, Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI), artificial general intelligence, wicked problem theory, Wicked problem theory, K1-7720, Technology governance, technology governance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
