
This chapter examines how governments have mobilised a discourse of compassion to reinforce a divide between ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ immigrants and refugees, and therefore withhold compassion from those unable to enact the conditions necessary for recognition as a worthy subject of compassion. It first explains how governments have deployed the feeling and framing rules of the emotional regime of compassion to withhold compassion from immigrants and refugees. It then describes two policy case studies that emphasised the vulnerability of immigrants and refugees: the Syrian Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Programme in the UK and the Australian Syrian and Iraqi Humanitarian Programme. It also analyses Donald Trump's presidential election campaign in 2016 to show how ‘suffering citizens’ have become centred as the legitimate subjects of compassion, at the expense of migrants and refugees.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
