
Background: After several years of storing a large number of historical medical books that had been weeded from the general collection, the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center developed a set of evaluation criteria to determine whether the material should be kept and included in the library catalog or discarded. The purpose of this article is to share lessons learned in evaluating and processing a historical medical book collection. The authors share how we determined review criteria as well as cataloging and processing procedures.Case Presentation: Best practices for evaluating, cataloging, and processing historical library material were determined through a literature search and then reviewed and adapted for application to this project. Eight hundred sixty-two titles were selected to add to the catalog and were added to a shelving location in our offsite storage facility.Conclusions: These materials are now discoverable in the library’s catalog for library users who are interested in historical research, and the materials have been processed for easy retrieval as well as preservation purposes.
Libraries, Medical, New Mexico, history of medicine, R, Case Report, Cataloging, Bibliography. Library science. Information resources, library collection development, book selection, Catalogs, Library, Library Collection Development, Medicine, Humans, Library Materials, Organizational Objectives, processing, collection assessment, cataloging, Z
Libraries, Medical, New Mexico, history of medicine, R, Case Report, Cataloging, Bibliography. Library science. Information resources, library collection development, book selection, Catalogs, Library, Library Collection Development, Medicine, Humans, Library Materials, Organizational Objectives, processing, collection assessment, cataloging, Z
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
