
pmid: 2750853
Abstract The purpose of this study was (a) to investigate the validity of the revised Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS) in discriminating between efficient and inefficient feeders in a sample of high-risk premature neonates and (b) to identify significantly different oral motor behaviors in the two groups. The revised NOMAS rates normal and abnormal characteristics of nutritive and nonnutritive sucking. The 26 subjects were classified by the amount of liquid they consumed during the first 5 min of feeding. The findings demonstrated that both nutritive and nonnutritive sucking scores were higher in the efficient feeders than in the inefficient feeders and that the revised NOMAS scores accurately classified the two groups. Characteristics that were significantly associated with inefficient feeding were lack of rhythm, disorganization in jaw and tongue movements, and pauses of more than 6 sec. Often, these responses appeared to be related to respiratory patterns.
Motor Skills, Respiration, Sucking Behavior, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Efficiency, Feeding Behavior, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Bottle Feeding
Motor Skills, Respiration, Sucking Behavior, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Efficiency, Feeding Behavior, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Bottle Feeding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 47 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
