
doi: 10.48516/004507
While higher rates of endogeny can help indexes identify journals being used for self-promotion, nepotism, or other unethical ends, endogeny itself should not be equated with them. Literally meaning growth from within, endogeny can be the result of a narrow or new field of research. Indexes should therefore avoid using the rate or percentage of endogeny as a standalone criterion for exclusion or delisting.
Library publishing, Journal indexes, Scholarly publishing
Library publishing, Journal indexes, Scholarly publishing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
