
doi: 10.48456/tr-464
Fast and accurate analysis of flourescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) images will depend mainly upon two components: a classifier to discriminate between artifacts and valid signal data, and well discriminating features to represent the signals. Our previous work has focused on the first component. To investigate the second component, we evaluate candidate feature sets by illustrating the probability density functions and scatter plots for the features. This analysis provides insight into dependencies between features, indicates the relative importancce of members of a feature set, and helps in identifying sources of potential classification errors. The analysis recommends several intensity and hue-based features for representing FISH signals. The recommendation is confirmed by the probability of misclassification using a two-layer neural network (NN), and also by a feature selection technique making use of a class separability criterion. Represented by these intensity and hue-based features, 90% of valid signals and artifacts are corrently classified using the NN.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
