Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Prioritizing Human-Centric and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) Criteria in Industry 4.0 and 5.0 Technologies Using an Integrated AHP-TOPSIS-VIKOR Framework

Authors: Aikhuele, Daniel Osezua;

Prioritizing Human-Centric and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) Criteria in Industry 4.0 and 5.0 Technologies Using an Integrated AHP-TOPSIS-VIKOR Framework

Abstract

The fast growth of digital technologies in Industry 4.0 brought monumental developments in automation systems and efficiency rates. However, the recent shift to Industry 5.0 has brough its own demands, this time the integration of human-centered, sustainable, and resilient approach into the manufacturing environment. This research establishes a strong Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework to meet this imperative knowledge gap in sustainable evaluation of innovative manufacturing and digital technologies. A thorough comparison of ten criteria of sustainability to environmental, economic as well as social indicators was conducted via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in order to determine their weighted importance. The process of evaluation included the application of Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and VIKOR method to a seven-emerging technology decision-making matrix. Tech C maintained the highest degree of sustainability among any of the alternatives with the TOPSIS value of 0.8106 and recorded a zero VIKOR value. The identical rankings being reached by both TOPSIS and VIKOR methods confirm the credibility of the model. The research provides a technical assessment method which allows stakeholders to select technologies based on Industry 5.0 philosophies through a framework that can be used for pragmatic and repetitive application.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!