Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Turkish Journal of V...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Turkish Journal of Veterinary Research
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Comparison of colostrum quality between Merino and Akkaraman ewes

Authors: Halime Kara; Yasin Şenel;

Comparison of colostrum quality between Merino and Akkaraman ewes

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the colostrum quality of Akkaraman and Merino ewes using refractometric measurements. Material-Method: The study material consisted of colostrum samples obtained from Akkaraman and Merino ewes reared under the continental climate of Ankara. The ewes were housed in separate barns on the same farm and received identical husbandry practices, feeding regimens, and synchronized lambing periods. Colostrum samples were collected within 4 hours postpartum via hand-milking into sterile polyethylene tubes. Samples were stored frozen until a target sample size of 50 per breed was attained, then thawed at room temperature before analysis. Brix values (%) of colostrum were determined using a digital refractometer (Milwaukee MA871, 0–85% range; Milwaukee Instruments, Inc., Rocky Mount, NC, USA). Colostrum quality was categorized as follows based on Brix values: 26% (good). Results: While half of the Merino ewes produced poor- or moderate-quality colostrum, 56% of Akkaraman ewes yielded good-quality colostrum. No statistically significant difference was observed in colostrum Brix values between the two breeds (p > 0.05). The minimum and maximum Brix values for Akkaraman ewes were 16.40% and 43.90%, respectively, whereas Merino ewes exhibited a range of 15.80% to 43.00%. The mean Brix value was 27.45% for Akkaraman ewes and 26.10% for Merino ewes. Conclusion: The colostrum quality of Akkaraman ewes was comparable to that of Merino ewes. These findings suggest that when compared to colostrum brix values of other breeds documented in the literature, Merino and Akkaraman breeds exhibit higher colostrum quality than dairy-type sheep but lower quality than meat-type sheep.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
gold