Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

PENELITIAN EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN

Authors: Muhammad Toriqularif;

PENELITIAN EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN

Abstract

To know the intricacies of something needed in a study, it was done to get an answer from the occurrence of something using scientific methods. In the world of research, there are at least two types of research, namely qualitative and quantitative. The following will be discussed about the evaluation research, in the world important research evaluation education is conducted in order to measure progress and further develop in a better direction. In principle, evaluation studies to make decisions by comparing data or information collected against criteria, standards, or benchmarks used as comparators for the data obtained. While evaluation is a systematic and ongoing process to determine the quality (value and meaning) of something, based on certain considerations and criteria in the framework of decision making. Among the evaluation models referred to IS; CIPP evaluation Model, UCLA Model evaluation, Brinkerhoff Model and Stake Model or Countenance Model. Meanwhile, evaluation research can be divided into two types, namely formative evaluation, and summative evaluation. The standard procedures in evaluation research are as follows; Clarification of reason to evaluate (explain the reasons why evaluation is held), choose Evaluation model, identify related parties, determination of components to be evaluated, identify evaluation questions, Compiling design evaluation and schedule of activities, collection, and analysis of data, reporting of evaluation results. Keywords: research, evaluation, and education

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!