Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Remote and Hybrid Work(Ers): Considerations for Regulating Remote Working Arrangements and a Code of Good Practice for Remote Work

Authors: Debbie Collier; Abigail Osiki;

Remote and Hybrid Work(Ers): Considerations for Regulating Remote Working Arrangements and a Code of Good Practice for Remote Work

Abstract

Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic intensified the focus on remote work and raised the need to evaluate the adequacy of labour legislation and workplace policies in the context of hybrid and remote-work arrangements. Remote work is characterised by the use of digital technology to perform tasks outside of the employer’s premises, often at the employee’s home. While it offers flexibility, inclusivity, and environmental benefits, it presents challenges too, for example in regard to enforcing employment standards, maintaining work-life balance, privacy, health and safety, and avoiding the risk of worker invisibility. Similarly, remote work poses difficulties for performance management and access to the workplace for inspection purposes. Key issues explored in this report include the regulation of working hours, occupational health and safety concerns, and compensation for occupational injuries. The report proposes the development of regulatory mechanisms — regulations and a Code of Good Practice — for remote work to provide certainty to remote workers and safeguard their well-being while balancing this with the interests of employers. The report thus provides guidance on remote-work policies in the workplace. Additionally, it considers legislative developments on flexible working arrangements that respond to the evolving nature of work in the digital era, promote work-life balance, and support gender equality.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!