Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evaluation of Landscape Design Using the Gray Relational Analysis Method

Evaluation of Landscape Design Using the Gray Relational Analysis Method

Abstract

Landscape Design in (GRA) Gray Relational Analysis. Landscape designers are often architectural, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Panorama Contract and with related fields such as craftsmanship They cooperate. Two of the design tasks There are distinct professional roles: Panorama Layout and Panorama Architecture. Nature Design is generally an art form and craftsmanship, Horticultural techniques and expertise contains, and final from ideological positions Product up to the best website online engagement asserts. City Planning, Urban and Neighborhood Parks, Civic and institutional landscapes, on a massive scale after completing intermediate tasks and designs Refers to landscape organization contractors. Of the expert depending on understanding, license and experience, two of skills and abilities between roles the composition can be significantly correlated. Landscape Designing GRA (Gray-related analysis) method Alternative: Concept testing model, Analytical synthesis model, Empirical Model, complex cognitive function model, Associations model. Evaluation Preference: Source of ideas, pre-design research Phase, post-construction evaluation phase, problem approach to judgment. shows that from the result it is seen that Approach to problem solving and is got the first rank whereas is the post-construction evaluation phase got is having the lowest rank. The value of the dataset for Landscape Designing GRA (Gray-related analysis) method shows that it results in Approach to problem solving and top ranking.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!