Argomenti contro la tortura. Garantismo penale e difetti dell'utilitarismo

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 2015 Italy Italian Publisher:Societ� Editrice Il MulinoJournal:Rivista di filosofia del diritto (issn: 2280-482X,

Copyright policy )

Authors: A. Chiessi; G. Scardovi;

doi: 10.4477/81591

handle: 11382/528750 , 11585/657081

Argomenti contro la tortura. Garantismo penale e difetti dell'utilitarismo

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

By suggesting two complementary lines of reasoning, this paper (written in Italian) argues against torture and its legalization. The first argument is focused on incompatibility of torture with penal guarantees and with the publicity of procedures and trials. The second is focused on the utilitarian dilemma of the Ticking Bomb and it shows that consequentialism, when it feeds moral legitimization from political consequences, can be rebutted because of a factual and a hypothetical error.

Country

Italy

Related Organizations

Keywords

Torture, Penal Guarantees, Utilitarianism, Ticking Bomb

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average