
doi: 10.4476/91194
handle: 11562/988529
By drawing from Rita Felski’s innovative theoretical framework, one that seeks to exit the paradigms of “againstness” (Felski 2015, 17), hegemonic in critical theories of the humanities, this essay proposes a genealogy of postcritique that seeks to rethink power. By deliberately assembling different theoretical traditions, the essay aims at establishing a genealogical nexus between the feminist tradition of the thought of sexual difference and Hannah Arendt, as possible creative sources for thinking of power in a generative way, outside the frames of both domination and subjection. This task is one with the need of an “affective realignment”, perceived as theoretically and politically necessary in order to discard the negativist attitude of most critical theory, which, in the end, seems to confirm and contribute to the maintenance of the “status quo”.
postcritique, power, Arendt, generative notion of politics
postcritique, power, Arendt, generative notion of politics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
