
doi: 10.4476/112559
handle: 10446/286389
In this paper, I analyse the different declinations of the concept of parrhesia. First, I perimeter the framework of the question: Foucault deconstructs the modern concept of truth and identifies the normative nature of the structures that legitimise it. Going back to ancient times, Foucault rediscovers the alethurgical forms through which the subject speaks its truth. One of these is parrhesia. The three declinations that Foucault studies refer to different contexts in ancient history.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
