
doi: 10.4469/a15-1.02
handle: 11567/992647
L’articolo considera e analizza il modello di titolario per la pubblica amministrazione elaborato e reso pubblico nel luglio del 2016 dall’Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale (AgID), in collaborazione con il Ministero dei beni e delle attività culturali e del turismo (MiBACT). L’intento è quello di richiamare l’attenzione della comunità archivistica su alcune scelte metodologiche che, a giudizio dell’autore, potrebbero snaturare il genuino significato della classificazione sistematica applicata alla tenuta degli archivi.
The article considers and analyzes the classification scheme for publics administrations worked out and published in July 2016 by Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale (AgID) and Ministero dei beni e delle attività culturali e del turismo (MiBACT). The aim is to get the attention of the archival community about some methodological choices which, in the opinion of the author, could misrepresent the real meaning of systematic classification in recordkeeping.
Records Management, Archival Classification, Agid Classification Scheme, Gestione documentale, classificazione archivistica, titolario AgID
Records Management, Archival Classification, Agid Classification Scheme, Gestione documentale, classificazione archivistica, titolario AgID
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
