<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 10419/89454
Abstract In principle there is a clear divide between science and technology. In practice there isn’t. In principle, while practical inventions can be patented, scientific findings can’t be. In practice, increasingly scientific findings are being patented. The argument of this paper is that this is bad for the advance of science and for the advance of technology. However, because of the blurry lines, it will not be easy to deal with. The paper lays out a strategy that at least has some promise.
Science, Technology, Patents, Open Knowledge., Technology, Forschung, Open Knowledge, ddc:330, Science, Marktwirtschaft, Capitalism, Market, Commons, Economics and Finance, Innovations and Technology, Law - Academic,, Wissenschaft, Patents
Science, Technology, Patents, Open Knowledge., Technology, Forschung, Open Knowledge, ddc:330, Science, Marktwirtschaft, Capitalism, Market, Commons, Economics and Finance, Innovations and Technology, Law - Academic,, Wissenschaft, Patents
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 479 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |