Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Collaborative Forest Management

Authors: Margaret Ann Moote;

Collaborative Forest Management

Abstract

In 1992, Jack Shipley, an avid conservationist, and Jim Neal, a long-time log-ger, began talking about ways to overcome the gridlock over land management in the Applegate watershed in Oregon, where environmentalists, agencies, and the timber industry all were in conflict. Together, they wrote a short paper outlining basic tenets of their plan, such as responsible extraction, no clearcuts, and no pesticides. Shipley solicited comments from environmental groups and natural resource management agencies and Neal similarly approached industry interests. They found that everyone was concerned about maintaining the long-term health of the watershed and the stability of local economies. Encouraged by this apparent common ground, Shipley and Neal organized a meeting in October 1992 with neighbors, representatives from industry, community groups, land management agencies, and several local environmental organizations to discuss a plan to make the Applegate watershed a demonstration site for ecologically and financially responsible resource management; thus, the Applegate Partnership was born (Shipley 1995).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!