
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>This chapter focuses on group outcome and assessment research with a specific emphasis on an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) approach, using as examples the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 (OQ) and the Group Questionnaire (GQ). Vignettes will illustrate the advantages and implementation of these clinical assessments. They will demonstrate how using this particular EBP approach provides real-time feedback to group leaders for group process variables of Positive Bond, Positive Work, and Negative Relationship. These process variables can be viewed in relation to member-to-member, member-to-group, and member-to-leader interactions. Further discussion of how such research-based assessments facilitate better outcomes for group members will be explored.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
