Reception Studies in the Rhetoric of Science

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Article 01 Jul 2005 English Publisher:RoutledgeJournal:Technical Communication Quarterly, volume 14, pages 249-255 (issn: 1057-2252, eissn: 1542-7625,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Randy Allen Harris;

doi: 10.4324/9781003059080-2 , 10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_2

Reception Studies in the Rhetoric of Science

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

This article encourages the increased attention to issues of reception in rhetoric of science, according with the sentiment but not the argument of Paul, Charney, and Kendall's "Moving beyond the Moment." In particular, it offers two works as exemplary of the disciplinary maturity that has occasioned this focus on reception, Ceccarelli's monograph, Shaping Science with Rhetoric, and Harris's collection, Rhetoric and Incommensurability.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	10
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average