
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>This chapter explores the application of corpora and corpus linguistics in forensic contexts. It documents the use of corpus methods in the field, particularly the relatively slow uptake of such approaches, despite some of the earliest and most important work relying on such approaches. Using recent corpus studies as examples, it summarises the main benefits that large datasets and corpus linguistic techniques hold for forensic linguists. The main part of the chapter draws on three research case studies to highlight important considerations when building corpora for forensic linguistics and to demonstrate the ways in which established corpus techniques and methods can assist in the analysis of forensically-relevant language data.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | 
