Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Design Optimization of Two Combined Four-Bar Mechanisms Using the Principles of Axiomatic Design

Authors: George Guo; Sophia Xu;

Design Optimization of Two Combined Four-Bar Mechanisms Using the Principles of Axiomatic Design

Abstract

<div class="htmlview paragraph">Two combined four-bar mechanisms have two functions: lift and collapse. In the current design, high effort was found for the collapse function. Axiomatic Design was used to analyze and optimize the current design. The customer domain was mapped into the functional domain by specifying customer needs in terms of functional requirements (FRs) and constraints (Cs). Design parameters (DPs) were identified in the physical domain for each functional requirement. Design matrices were then defined to characterize the product design.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The two combined four-bar mechanisms have two functional requirements at the highest level: lift and collapse. The corresponding DPs are: lift four-bar linkage and collapse four-bar linkage. Through zigzagging to decompose to the next level, the design was found to be coupled. At this level, a torsion spring was selected as the DP for minimizing the lift effort. However, this DP was also found to affect three next level FRs for the collapse: the front leg rotation, the rear leg rotation and the float link rolling. This coupling greatly increased the collapse operation effort because the spring was useful for the lift function but was a hindrance for the collapse function.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The design was decoupled by adding two locks, which are called floating link lock and front leg lock, and an extra plate which is called locking plate. The new modified design can improve customer satisfaction because when the rear lock and the floating link lock are released, the torsion spring will assist the lift, and when front lock and front leg lock are released, the torsion spring will not resist the collapse.</div>

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!