Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Pedestrian Throw Kinematics in Forward Projection Collisions

Authors: Thomas F. Fugger; Bryan C. Randles; Jesse L. Wobrock; Jerry J. Eubanks;

Pedestrian Throw Kinematics in Forward Projection Collisions

Abstract

<div class="htmlview paragraph">Pedestrian crash kinematics have been well documented for automobile versus pedestrian collisions. However, there is not significant amount of data concerning impact of pedestrians with a high profile vehicle. A series of pedestrian crash tests using full-sized vans was performed to add to the existing database of forward projection pedestrian collisions and to compare the crash test data to existing forward throw equations. The aim of this study was to examine the trajectory behavior of the pedestrian in a forward projection impact and the effect of different friction-value surfaces when applying a pedestrian model to the data.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">In performing the tests, the pedestrian dummy was stabilized using an 18.2 kg tensile strength monofilament wire hanging from a cantilever beam. The impacting vans were instrumented with a triaxial accelerometer triggered at impact with the dummy. Several testing surfaces were used, ranging from dry asphalt to a skidpad with &gt; 1/16<sup>th</sup> inch depth of water. The trials were videotaped using two high-speed digital camcorders that recorded at 120 Hz and 240 Hz., respectively. Each trial was computer digitized and analyzed using motion analysis software. The results of the digitized analysis were compared to the measured throw distance and velocity profile integrated from the from the accelerometer data of the van. The impact speed versus throw distance was plotted and compared to existing forward projection throw models. Additionally, the trajectory of the dummy was analyzed for the forward projection collisions and compared to existing models and previous wrap trajectory data. Comparison of the pedestrian throw kinematics and vehicle kinematics were compared over the various testing surfaces.</div>

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!