<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.4244/eijv12sya10
pmid: 27640030
Bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) is not rare in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Bicuspid valves have unique anatomy which could affect the results of TAVI; however, multiple recent reports have shown that TAVI is safe and effective in this population. Paravalvular aortic regurgitation was initially found to be more frequent in bicuspid patients, but newer-generation devices have shown superior results in this respect. Higher rates of pacemaker implantation after TAVI in bicuspid AS do require further investigation. Current data suggest that bicuspid valves should not be a contraindication for TAVI, but future specific trials are needed to support this assertion.
Patient Selection, Heart Valve Diseases, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Prosthesis Design, Aortography, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Treatment Outcome, Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Aortic Valve, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Patient Selection, Heart Valve Diseases, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Prosthesis Design, Aortography, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Treatment Outcome, Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Aortic Valve, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |