
pmid: 22653648
The development of DNA markers that can closely discriminate between Liriope and Ophiopogon species is vital for efficient and accurate identification of these species, and to ensure the quality, safety, and efficacy of medicines made from these plants. We developed species-specific molecular markers for these two genera. Forty RAPD primers were tested to detect polymorphism; species-specific RAPD bands were gel-purified, cloned, and sequenced. Primers for sequence-characterized amplified regions (SCARs) were then designed, based on nucleotide sequences of specific RAPD primers. SCAR markers SA06 and SB05, specific to Ophiopogon japonicus, amplified 460- and 553-bp DNA fragments, respectively. The marker SA12 amplified a 485-bp fragment specific to Liriope platyphylla. This is the first report of a species-specific SCAR marker for this group. These markers will be useful for rapid identification of closely related Liriope and Ophiopogon species.
Genetic Markers, Liriope Plant, Plants, Medicinal, Polymorphism, Genetic, Base Sequence, DNA, Plant, Nucleotides, Ophiopogon, Molecular Sequence Data, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique, Species Specificity, Organ Specificity, Cloning, Molecular, Genome, Plant
Genetic Markers, Liriope Plant, Plants, Medicinal, Polymorphism, Genetic, Base Sequence, DNA, Plant, Nucleotides, Ophiopogon, Molecular Sequence Data, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique, Species Specificity, Organ Specificity, Cloning, Molecular, Genome, Plant
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
