
Seeking the largest solution to an expression of the form A x <= B is a common task in several domains of engineering and computer science. This largest solution is commonly called quotient. Across domains, the meanings of the binary operation and the preorder are quite different, yet the syntax for computing the largest solution is remarkably similar. This paper is about finding a common framework to reason about quotients. We only assume we operate on a preorder endowed with an abstract monotonic multiplication and an involution. We provide a condition, called admissibility, which guarantees the existence of the quotient, and which yields its closed form. We call preordered heaps those structures satisfying the admissibility condition. We show that many existing theories in computer science are preordered heaps, and we are thus able to derive a quotient for them, subsuming existing solutions when available in the literature. We introduce the concept of sieved heaps to deal with structures which are given over multiple domains of definition. We show that sieved heaps also have well-defined quotients.
In Proceedings GandALF 2020, arXiv:2009.09360
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM), Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL), General Engineering, quotient in computer science, preorderd heaps, sieved heaps, General Earth and Planetary Sciences, Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory, General Environmental Science, Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM), Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL), General Engineering, quotient in computer science, preorderd heaps, sieved heaps, General Earth and Planetary Sciences, Computer Science - Formal Languages and Automata Theory, General Environmental Science, Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
