
doi: 10.4193/rhin24.005
pmid: 39660677
Background: The intravenous olfactory test (alinamin test [AT]) is a retronasal olfactory assessment and may evaluate the flavour disorder; however, studies assessing whether AT accurately determines the severity of taste disorders are lacking. Our study aims to evaluate the relationship between AT and subjective taste disorders in the patiensts with olfactory disorder. Methods: Between April 2019 and March 2020, 228 patients visited our smell clinic reporting olfactory disorders. Of these, 193 patients who underwent AT were included in this study. We evaluated the differences in AT response, latency time, and duration time between patients with and without subjective taste disorder. We also assessed the degree of subjective taste disorder experienced by patients using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the correlation between latency and duration time of AT. To assess taste perception more broadly, we inquired about the presence of disorder using the term “taste” rather than “flavour,” without focusing on any specific type of taste disorder. Results: Of the included 193 patients, 62 reported awareness of a taste disorder. The duration time of AT was significantly shorter in patients with subjective taste disorder. A weak correlation was found between the VAS scores for subjective taste disorders and the duration time of AT. Conclusions: Our results showed that among the patients with olfactory disorders, the duration time of AT was reduced for those with subjective taste disorders.
Male, Adult, Smell, Olfaction Disorders, Taste Disorders, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Aged
Male, Adult, Smell, Olfaction Disorders, Taste Disorders, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
