
pmid: 12667278
Ten million or more newborns worldwide each year need some type of resuscitation assistance. More than 1 million babies die annually from complications of birth asphyxia. Over the past 3 decades, neonatal resuscitation has evolved from disparate, word-of-mouth teaching methods to organized programs. The most widely-used curriculum is the Neonatal Resuscitation Program, which is supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association. To date more than 1.5 million individuals have been trained in the Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Resuscitation efforts are geared toward avoiding or mitigating the adverse sequelae of asphyxia neonatorum. Certain characteristics distinguish the preterm infant, including propensity to become hypothermic and higher potential for adverse neurologic and pulmonary complications from resuscitation efforts. In this era of evidence-based medicine the most recent Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines were developed to provide recommendations based on the best currently-available science. A number of major proposals received considerable scrutiny during the evaluation process. Many areas of neonatal resuscitation still need to be studied.
Asphyxia Neonatorum, Evidence-Based Medicine, Hypocapnia, Resuscitation, Infant, Newborn, Guidelines as Topic, Pregnancy, Intensive Care, Neonatal, Humans, Female, Infant, Premature
Asphyxia Neonatorum, Evidence-Based Medicine, Hypocapnia, Resuscitation, Infant, Newborn, Guidelines as Topic, Pregnancy, Intensive Care, Neonatal, Humans, Female, Infant, Premature
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
