Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ege University Insti...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Acta Endocrinologica (Bucharest)
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TESTS IN THE SINGLETON AND TWIN PREGNANCY

Authors: Saraç F.; Tutuncuoglu P.; Tavmergen E.; Saygili F.; Ozgen A.G.; Tuzun M.;

GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TESTS IN THE SINGLETON AND TWIN PREGNANCY

Abstract

Objective. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as glucose intolerance that is detected for the first time during pregnancy. Normal pregnancy induces insulin resistance through the diabetogenic effects of placental hormones. Glucose tolerance test results in twin and singleton pregnancies were compared in this study. Subjects and Methods. A total of 360 pregnant women were Studied. 200 women (mean age 31.60 +/- 2.10 yr) had singleton pregnancies (Group I) and 160 women (mean age 28.20 2.70 yr) had twin pregnancies (Group II). 50- g, 1- hour glucose tolerance test was conducted oil the first prenatal visit. An abnormal glucose screen defined as glucose >= 140 mg/dL was followed by a 100g, 3-hour glucose tolerance test. Gestational diabetes was defined as the presence of two or more abnormal values during the 3-hour test. Results. Gestational diabetes was found in 4 of the 200 (2%) singleton pregnant women and 8 of the 160 (5%) twin pregnant women. Group I (Singleton) was further divided into two Subgroups according to whether the 1-hr plasma glucose level was 140 ma/dL (Group Ib). Likewise, Group II pregnancies was also divided into two subgroups oil the same basis. Mean screening test glucose levels were found to be 127.8 +/- 14.94 mg/dL ill Group la and 150.8 +/- 18.1 mg/dL in Group Ib women. Mean screening test glucose levels of Group IIa subjects was 92.80 +/- 18.30 mg/dL while that of Group IIb Subjects was 154.8 +/- 27.0 mg/dL. Mean 1(st) h glucose levels of 100-g glucose tolerance test was found to be 131.4 +/- 32.58 mg/dL in Group I, and 112.5 +/- 39.6 mg/dL in Group II. Mean 2(nd) h glucose tolerance test values were 133.2 +/- 28.8 mg/dL in Group I and 100.6 +/- 28.8 mg/dL in Group II. Mean 3(rd) h glucose tolerance test values were 107.6 +/- 23.58 mg/dl in Group I and 72 +/- 16.9 mg/dL in Group II. Conclusion: Glucose screening results and 100-g, 3- hour glucose tolerance test values have been found to be lower in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies. Therefore, we suggest that these findings be taken into account in developing diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes ill twin or more pregnancies.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Twin pregnancy, glucose tolerance, Glucose tolerance, Singleton pregnancy, twin pregnancy, gestational diabetes, singleton pregnancy, Gestational diabetes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!