
doi: 10.4155/bio.11.155
pmid: 21827274
One of the central challenges to metabolomics is metabolite identification. Regardless of whether one uses so-called 'targeted' or 'untargeted' metabolomics, eventually all paths lead to the requirement of identifying (and quantifying) certain key metabolites. Indeed, without metabolite identification, the results of any metabolomic analysis are biologically and chemically uninterpretable. Given the chemical diversity of most metabolomes and the character of most metabolomic data, metabolite identification is intrinsically difficult. Consequently a great deal of effort in metabolomics over the past decade has been focused on making metabolite identification better, faster and cheaper. This review describes some of the newly emerging techniques or technologies in metabolomics that are making metabolite identification easier and more robust. In particular, it focuses on advances in metabolite identification that have occurred over the past 2 to 3 years concerning the technologies, methodologies and software as applied to NMR, MS and separation science. The strengths and limitations of some of these approaches are discussed along with some of the important trends in metabolite identification.
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, ultra performance liquid chromatography, metabolite, methodology, metabolomics, Mass Spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemical analysis, computer program, Metabolome, Humans, Metabolomics, intermethod comparison, metabolism, Software, mass spectrometry, Chromatography, Liquid
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, ultra performance liquid chromatography, metabolite, methodology, metabolomics, Mass Spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemical analysis, computer program, Metabolome, Humans, Metabolomics, intermethod comparison, metabolism, Software, mass spectrometry, Chromatography, Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 250 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
