
doi: 10.4141/cjss93-031
handle: 11588/344531 , 11386/4679801 , 2158/220631 , 11563/6729
Two well-characterized humic acids (HA), extracted from a volcanic soil and a leonhardite, were used to synthesize insoluble Fe complexes. The complexes were treated at different concentrations and contact times with a siderophore (deferoxamine mesylate) and a mixture of simple organic acids (citric, oxalic, tartaric, and ketoglutaric acids) naturally occurring in root exudates in order to evaluate the capacity of the extracting solutions to desorb Fe from the humic complexes. Results showed that iron can be extracted from the complexes according to the concentrations and pH of the extractants. The mixture of organic acids was generally a better extractant than the siderophore at the high concentration because of lower solution pH. Despite constant differences in solution pH, the extracting capacity of the two extractants was similar at lower concentrations. However, the extent of desorption varied with HA characteristics. Iron appeared to be more easily released from complexes with HA rich in aliphatic carbons than from those with HA rich in aromatic carbons. These findings were attributed to the stereochemical complexity of highly aromatic humic substances that prevents natural chelators to easily reach the Fe complexing sites. Key words: Humic substances, iron, siderophores, organic acids, plant chlorosis
organic acid, Humic substance, iron, siderophore, plant chlorosis, HUMIC SUBSTANCES; IRON; SIDEROPHORES; ORGANIC ACIDS; PLANT CHLOROSIS, Humic substances; iron; siderophores; organic acids; plant chlorosis
organic acid, Humic substance, iron, siderophore, plant chlorosis, HUMIC SUBSTANCES; IRON; SIDEROPHORES; ORGANIC ACIDS; PLANT CHLOROSIS, Humic substances; iron; siderophores; organic acids; plant chlorosis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
