Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Canadian Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
Article . 1972 . Peer-reviewed
License: CSP TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

BIRDSFOOT TREFOIL CULTIVARS AS HOSTS FOR ROOT-LESION NEMATODES AND EFFECTS OF NEMATODES ON YIELDS

Authors: C. B. WILLIS; L. S. THOMPSON;

BIRDSFOOT TREFOIL CULTIVARS AS HOSTS FOR ROOT-LESION NEMATODES AND EFFECTS OF NEMATODES ON YIELDS

Abstract

Results of a greenhouse test with eight cultivars and two selections of birdsfoot trefoil, Lotus corniculatus L., indicated that forage yields were significantly reduced by Pratylenchus penetrans (Cobb 1917) Filip. and Stek. 1941. Forage yields of all cultivars and selections at the fifth and sixth cuttings and total yields for the 285-day experimental period were significantly lower than non-infested checks. Root production was significantly reduced by P. penetrans. Reductions in forage yield and root production as a result of nematode infestation were similar for all cultivars and selections. Nematode increase by the end of the experimental period did not differ significantly among cultivars or selections. In a field test, forage yields, numbers of nematodes recovered from rootlets, and recovery of Fusarium spp. fungi from rootlets and tap roots did not differ significantly among seven cultivars.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!