Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Canadian Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Article . 1971 . Peer-reviewed
License: CSP TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

A RAPID MICRO-DIGESTION PROCEDURE FOR NEUTRAL AND ACID DETERGENT FIBER

Authors: D. E. WALDERN;

A RAPID MICRO-DIGESTION PROCEDURE FOR NEUTRAL AND ACID DETERGENT FIBER

Abstract

A micro-digestion procedure for the determination of neutral (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) employing 0.35 g of sample was developed. Four roughages and corn grain were digested by the standard Van Soest macro acid and neutral detergent fiber methods, and by the micro method. Differences between two-thirds of the means for NDF and ADF, as determined by the two methods, were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Absolute differences between means for all samples analyzed were small, with a range from 2.82 to 1.41 percentage units for NDF and 0.85 to 0.14 percentage units for ADF. Neutral detergent fiber determinations of corn grain were completed without filtration problems when the micro-digestion method was employed, in contrast to the difficult filtrations encountered with the macro method. Standard deviations of means for samples digested by the micro method were small except for corn grain.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!