Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Canadian Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: CSP TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

The collection of multiple saliva samples from pigs and the effect on adrenocortical activity

Authors: Nigel J. Cook; Stephanie M. Hayne; Fiona C. Rioja-Lang; Allan L. Schaefer; Harold W. Gonyou;

The collection of multiple saliva samples from pigs and the effect on adrenocortical activity

Abstract

Cook, N. J., Hayne, S. M., Rioja-Lang, F. C., Schaefer, A. L. and Gonyou, H. W. 2013. The collection of multiple saliva samples from pigs and the effect on adrenocortical activity. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 93: 329–333. The validity of collecting multiple saliva samples for the measurement of cortisol was tested in two sampling regimes in two weight classes of grower pigs (50 and 100 kg). The sampling regimes were a high-frequency, short-duration (HFSD) protocol involving collection of multiple samples within approximately 2 min of each other over a period 30 min. The second regime was a low-frequency, long-duration (LFLD) protocol in which samples were collected every 30 min for 3 h. Both sampling regimes were applied to individually housed pigs. The effect of repeated sampling of a focal pig on its cohorts in a group-housed pen was tested using the LFLD regime. There was no evidence of an effect of either of the sampling protocols on salivary cortisol concentrations in individually housed or group-housed pigs. There was some evidence that higher concentrations of salivary cortisol were associated with longer individual sampling durations in the HFSD regime for animals in the 50-kg weight class but not in the 100-kg weight class. The evidence from these experiments indicates that the collection of multiple saliva samples does not affect salivary cortisol concentrations in grower pigs, but that collection of individual samples in as short a time as possible would be prudent to avoid sampling effects in younger animals.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!