Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ EAI Endorsed Transac...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
EAI Endorsed Transactions on AI and Robotics
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Cutting-Edge Techniques for Detecting Fake Reviews

Authors: Kuldeep Vayadande; Amit Mishra; Gajanan R. Patil; Yogesh Bodhe; Pavitha Nooji; Ninad Kale; Anish Katariya; +3 Authors

Cutting-Edge Techniques for Detecting Fake Reviews

Abstract

The paper reviews various approaches for detecting fake reviews using different machine learning techniques, each with distinct strengths and limitations. It examines existing literature on supervised learning methods, unsupervised techniques, graph-based models, and hybrid approaches. Among these, unsupervised models rely on pattern recognition, while supervised methods, including SVM and transformer-based models like BERT, offer high accuracy but struggle with class imbalance and computational efficiency. Unsupervised and graph-based models serve as effective alternatives when labeled data is scarce or when complex relationships between reviews and users must be analyzed. Additionally, hybrid approaches that integrate multiple techniques are gaining traction, as they enhance feature selection and model performance. In this paper, we explore different methodologies for fake review classification, analyze their advantages and drawbacks, and highlight key challenges in the field.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold