
A bstract Aim: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Vietnamese version of the Index of Dental Anxiety and Fear – Core Module (IDAF-4C) and assess its psychometric properties among adult dental patients in Vietnam. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 243 adult patients at a university dental hospital in Hanoi. The English IDAF-4C was translated into Vietnamese (V-IDAF-4C) following established cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with principal axis factoring and varimax rotation. Convergent validity was evaluated by correlating the V-IDAF-4C with the Vietnamese Modified Dental Anxiety scale (MDAS) using Spearman’s coefficient. Results: The V-IDAF-4C demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.88). EFA confirmed a unidimensional structure, with a single factor explaining 54.78% of the total variance (eigenvalue = 4.38) and strong factor loadings for all eight items (ranging from 0.42 to 0.87). Strong convergent validity was established through a significant positive correlation with the MDAS (Spearman’s ρ = 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.67–0.79; P < 0.01). The prevalence of moderate-to-high dental anxiety was 28.39% (19.34% moderate, 9.05% high) according to the V-IDAF-4C scale. Conclusion: The Vietnamese IDAF-4C demonstrates good validity and reliability for assessing the multidimensional aspects of dental anxiety and fear. It is a suitable tool for clinicians and researchers in Vietnam to screen for dental anxiety and fear, which can help in developing tailored patient management strategies and more effective treatment plans.
Original Article
Original Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
