<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Testing to detect ABO incompatibility between a donor and potential transfusion recipient is the foundation on which all other pretransfusion testing is based. Sometimes, weak agglutination reactions may be obtained with reagent antibodies due to weak expression of A and B antigens on red blood cell (RBC) surface which may cause a discrepancy in blood group typing. Here, we report a patient showing discrepancy between RBCs (forward) and serum (reverse) typing. After doing detailed analysis, the blood type as a variant of blood Group A revealed. Subgroups of A are very rare phenotype of blood. Weaker subgroups of A blood group reported so far are mainly A3, Aend, Ax, Am, Ay, and Ael. We are reporting a case of a 35-year-old patient whose RBCs showed a discrepancy between cell and serum grouping during initial testing. Serological investigation included absorption elution tests and saliva tests after performing initial blood grouping. The serological characteristics of the patient's red cells were similar to A3 subtype. The patient was a secretor and A and H substance was present in the saliva. Serum did not show any presence of anti-A1. The weak A phenotype identified had serological characteristics similar to A3.
discrepancy, Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, Case Report, reverse typing, RC633-647.5, a3 subgroup, blood grouping, forward typing
discrepancy, Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, Case Report, reverse typing, RC633-647.5, a3 subgroup, blood grouping, forward typing
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |