
This article sets out to question the claim that “postmodernism” is merely a development of the second half of the 20th century. What is unique about contemporary postmodernism is the way in which it has combined intellectual developments that emerged during the past five hundred years in a special manner. Therefore the supposed relatively recent origin of postmodernity it is not only misleading but also historically unsound. This is shown by going back to the pre- Enlightenment roots of both “modernity” and “postmodernity” – and it is done by accounting for the emergence and historical sources of modern irrationalism, historicism and the so-called “linguistic turn”.
Irrationalism, Post-Modernism, BV1-5099, Nominalism, Historicism, Moral theology, Practical Theology, BV4625-4780
Irrationalism, Post-Modernism, BV1-5099, Nominalism, Historicism, Moral theology, Practical Theology, BV4625-4780
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
