
Our aim was to develop an APpendictis-PEdiatric score (APPE score) in quantifying risk of acute appendicitis based on combination of clinical and laboratory markers. 1025 patients were classified in: acute appendicitis (AA) and non-appendicitis. Demographic/clinical features, and laboratory were collected. They were compared for quantitative-variables and categorical-variables. Significant predictors (P=<0,05) were included in logistic regression model. Based on regression-coefficients, a diagnostic score was tested by calculating the area under the ROC curve. Two cut-offs were established to define classes of risk of AA. 9 variables were identified as potentially predictors for AA. Those underwent logistic regression and a score was assigned, for maximum 21-points. The score showed an area under the curve: 0.831 and a linear proportion with the state of appendicular inflammation (R20.85). Patients with a score ≤8 were at low risk of AA (sensitivity 94%); those with a score ≥15 were at high risk for AA (specificity 93%). Those between 8 and 15 were defined at intermediate risk class. APPE-score guides clinicians in classifying patients with suspected-AA according to clinical and laboratory findings in order to improve their management.
Male, Risk, Abdominal pain, RD1-811, Adolescent, Pediatrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, RJ1-570, Acute abdomen, Cohort Studies, Abdominal pain; Acute abdomen; Appendectomy; Children, Appendectomy, Humans, Child, Children, Retrospective Studies, Inflammation, Infant, Appendicitis, ROC Curve, Child, Preschool, Surgery, Female
Male, Risk, Abdominal pain, RD1-811, Adolescent, Pediatrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, RJ1-570, Acute abdomen, Cohort Studies, Abdominal pain; Acute abdomen; Appendectomy; Children, Appendectomy, Humans, Child, Children, Retrospective Studies, Inflammation, Infant, Appendicitis, ROC Curve, Child, Preschool, Surgery, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
