
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Introduction: Adverse incidents (AI) are ubiquitous and often under-reported in the medical care system including the ICU. Objective: To examine the frequency, category, severity and consequences of AI on every patient in the paedriatric ICU, Padre Hurtado Hospital. Patients and Methods: 2 133 admissions over a 38 month period (1999-2002) were evaluated. An AI was defined as any event which could or did reduce the safety margin of a patient. Using a non-punitive recording system on a prospective cohort, AI were categorized into airway (A), mechanical ventilator (MV), invasive device (ID), drug (D) or others (O). The causes were human error (HE), equipment malfunction (EM) or infrastructure (I), and the severity graded as mayor (MAI) or minor (mAI). Results: 96 episodes occurred in 73 patients, 3,4% of admissions, categorized as ID 44%, D 18%, A 16%, MV 6% and O 13%. MAI were 61%, A was the most prevalent MAI, 27% and 77% of AI were considered avoidable. One child died as a result of category A AI. Conclusions: AI are common, and it is possible to report them. There is no doubt that patient safety can be improved by the proper recognition of an AI.
evento adverso, critical events, incidente crítico, cuidado intensivo, patient´s safety, adverse events, monitoreo de incidentes, medical errors, seguridad de paciente, monitoring incident, error médico, intensive care
evento adverso, critical events, incidente crítico, cuidado intensivo, patient´s safety, adverse events, monitoreo de incidentes, medical errors, seguridad de paciente, monitoring incident, error médico, intensive care
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
