
Abstract G-protein-coupled chemoattractant receptors signal transiently upon ligand binding to effect cell orientation and motility but then are rapidly desensitized. The importance of desensitization has been unclear, because mutated nondesensitizable receptors mediate efficient chemotaxis. We hypothesized that homologous receptor desensitization is required for cellular navigation in fields of competing attractants. Modeling of receptor-mediated orientation shows that desensitization allows integration of attractant signals. Cells expressing normal receptors are predicted to 1) orient preferentially to distant gradients; 2) seek an intermediate position between balanced agonist sources; 3) and can be repositioned between chemoattractant-defined microenvironmental domains by modest changes in receptor number. In contrast, in the absence of desensitization, orientation is dominated by local agonist sources, precluding continued navigation. Furthermore, cell orientation in competing ligand gradients depends on the relative kinetic rates of receptor desensitization and recycling. We propose that homologous receptor desensitization is critical for cellular navigation in complex chemoattractant fields.
Intracellular Fluid, Receptors, CXCR5, Receptors, CCR7, B-Lymphocyte Subsets, Models, Immunological, Ligands, Chemokine CXCL13, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Up-Regulation, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Structural Homology, Protein, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Humans, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction
Intracellular Fluid, Receptors, CXCR5, Receptors, CCR7, B-Lymphocyte Subsets, Models, Immunological, Ligands, Chemokine CXCL13, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Up-Regulation, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Structural Homology, Protein, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Humans, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
