
pmid: 11466330
Abstract CD1d-restricted Vα14-Jα281 invariant αβTCR+ (NKT) cells are well defined in the C57BL/6 mouse strain, but they remain poorly characterized in non-NK1.1-expressing strains. Surrogate markers for NKT cells such as αβTCR+CD4−CD8− and DX5+CD3+ have been used in many studies, although their effectiveness in defining this lineage remains to be verified. Here, we compare NKT cells among C57BL/6, NK1.1-congenic BALB/c, and NK1.1-congenic nonobese diabetic mice. NKT cells were identified and compared using a range of approaches: NK1.1 expression, surrogate phenotypes used in previous studies, labeling with CD1d/α-galactosylceramide tetramers, and cytokine production. Our results demonstrate that NKT cells and their CD4/CD8-defined subsets are present in all three strains, and confirm that nonobese diabetic mice have a numerical and functional deficiency in these cells. We also highlight the hazards of using surrogate phenotypes, none of which accurately identify NKT cells, and one in particular (DX5+CD3+) actually excludes these cells. Finally, our results support the concept that NK1.1 expression may not be an ideal marker for CD1d-restricted NKT cells, many of which are NK1.1-negative, especially within the CD4+ subset and particularly in NK1.1-congenic BALB/c mice.
Binding Sites, Membrane Glycoproteins, CD3 Complex, CD8 Antigens, 610, CD24 Antigen, Galactosylceramides, Immunophenotyping, Antigens, CD1, Killer Cells, Natural, Antigens, CD, Antigens, Surface, Animals, Antigens, Ly, Cytokines, Lectins, C-Type, Lymphocyte Count, Antigens, Antigens, CD1d, L-Selectin, Carrier Proteins
Binding Sites, Membrane Glycoproteins, CD3 Complex, CD8 Antigens, 610, CD24 Antigen, Galactosylceramides, Immunophenotyping, Antigens, CD1, Killer Cells, Natural, Antigens, CD, Antigens, Surface, Animals, Antigens, Ly, Cytokines, Lectins, C-Type, Lymphocyte Count, Antigens, Antigens, CD1d, L-Selectin, Carrier Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 202 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
