Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Journal of Immun...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Journal of Immunology
Article . 1994 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Effect of anti-CD4 on CD4 subsets. I. Anti-CD4 preferentially deletes resting, naive CD4 cells and spares activated CD4 cells.

Authors: J H, Chace; J S, Cowdery; E H, Field;

Effect of anti-CD4 on CD4 subsets. I. Anti-CD4 preferentially deletes resting, naive CD4 cells and spares activated CD4 cells.

Abstract

Abstract Anti-CD4 has been extensively studied in murine models of autoimmunity and transplantation. The timing of anti-CD4 administration in these systems is critical because anti-CD4 effectively blocks primary T-dependent responses but does not diminish ongoing or memory responses in immunized animals. These differential effects suggest that anti-CD4 suppresses a subpopulation of CD4+ cells. We previously observed in vitro that simultaneous activation through TCR-T3 rescued CD4+ cells from anti-CD4 elimination. From this we hypothesized that activated CD4+ cells resisted the effects of anti-CD4. We now show that in vivo treatment with anti-CD4 preferentially eliminated resting, naive CD4+ cells rather than memory and effector CD4+ cells. The CD4+ cells that remained after anti-CD4 treatment exhibited evidence of recent activation, because a higher percentage expressed IL-2R, regardless of subset phenotype. Moreover, Mls-1-primed, anti-CD4-treated mice showed a higher percentage of V beta 6+ (Mls-1 reactive) CD4+ cells than either unprimed mice, anti-CD4-treated mice, or Mls-1-primed controls, implicating the importance of recent activation. These anti-CD4-resistant cells also retained their functional abilities. T cells from BALB/c mice treated with anti-CD4 after Mls-1 immunization maintained their MLR proliferation against DBA/2 stimulator cells. In addition, anti-CD4 did not reduce T-dependent antibody responses in mice previously primed against the Ag cholera toxin or SRBC. Thus, activated CD4+ cells resist the suppressive effects of anti-CD4. Our findings have critical implications for the ongoing clinical trials using anti-CD4.

Keywords

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Lymphocyte Activation, Lymphocyte Depletion, Minor Lymphocyte Stimulatory Antigens, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mice, Inbred DBA, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Antibody Formation, Animals, Female, Lymphocyte Culture Test, Mixed, Immunologic Memory

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    75
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
75
Average
Top 10%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!